[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd4cb8901002031551h3f1edb2bj706c768344fcd93f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 00:51:30 +0100
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jamie Iles <jamie.iles@...ochip.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] perf_events, x86: PEBS support
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 15:40 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>> If only they would reset the counter on overflow instead of on record,
>> that would solve quite a few issues I imagine.
>
> So I tried enabling the regular PMC overflow interrupt and reprogramming
> the counter from that, but touching the counter seems to destroy the
> PEBS assist, so much for that idea.
>
Yes, you have to leave the INT bit off, otherwise you get an
interrupt for each overflow, thus you lose the buffer advantage.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists