linux-kernel - Re: [PWM PATCH 1/5] API to consolidate PWM devices behind a common user and kernel interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B68F791.3040006@billgatliff.com>
Date:	Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:12:01 -0600
From:	Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>
To:	H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
CC:	linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PWM PATCH 1/5] API to consolidate PWM devices behind a common
 user and kernel interface

H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> +	for (wchan = 0; wchan < pwm->nchan; wchan++) {
>> +		if (pwm->channels[wchan].flags & FLAG_REQUESTED) {
>>     
>
> Shouldn't this be:
>
> 	& BIT(FLAG_REQUESTED)
>
>   

Yes.  I've fixed that one several times now!  I think I need to review
my git-fu, especially rebasing.

> Nitpick... Can you move the #ifndef/#define to after the comment?
>   

I did that in all the others, I guess I missed this one...


b.g.

-- 
Bill Gatliff
bgat@...lgatliff.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/