[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100204051816.E8F68815A@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:18:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To: "Lu, Hongjiu" <hongjiu.lu@...el.com>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Lachner, Peter" <peter.lachner@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [patch] x86: ptrace and core-dump extensions for xstate
> > Suresh's patch puts this value in the xsave block, in what Suresh calls
> > "sw_usable_bytes". See the asm/ptrace-abi.h comment in the patch you
> > signed off on.
> >
> > How is that not sufficient? If it is indeed not sufficient to usefully
> > interpret the xsave block, then how could an xsave block in a core dump
> > file ever possibly be examined if it might not have been generated on the
> > same system and kernel where the debugger is doing the examination? If
> > the NT_X86_XSTATE note as implemented in Suresh's patch is indeed not
> > entirely self-contained in this way, then NAK on that new note format.
> >
>
> I use it when reading core dump, which doesn't involve a system call.
> I can analyze it on a totally different machine.
You did not answer any of my questions.
Perhaps Suresh can be more helpful in explaining the situation.
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists