[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1265272174.2952.20.camel@localhost>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:29:34 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: stable@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable-review@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 'flush_old_exec()/setup_new_exec()' split
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 21:39 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > I'm using Debian i386 (i.e. 32-bit userland) with a 64-bit kernel.
> > After applying commit 221af7f to Debian's kernel source (approximately
> > equivalent to 2.6.32.7), the kernel fails to exec init. After commit
> > 7ab02af it can exec init but that immediately segfaults:
>
> It sounds like you have picked individual commits.
Yes - I'm one of the kernel package maintainers and we're sticking with
2.6.32-stable.
> But you don't mention commit 05d43ed8a, which is also a required part of
> the series.
>
> So you _should_ have a combination of
> - 221af7f87 ("Split 'flush_old_exec' into two functions")
> - 05d43ed8a ("x86: get rid of the insane TIF_ABI_PENDING bit")
> - 7ab02af42 ("Fix 'flush_old_exec()/setup_new_exec()' split")
>
> (and there are also additional sparc/ppc versions of that TIF_ABI_PENDING
> bit removal, but they shouldn't matter on your system)
Thanks. If all the necessary patches are all in the stable queue then
we can pick them from there.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
friends: People who know you well, but like you anyway.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists