[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f17812d71002031654t53d4d7b1wd9933633636f9d63@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:54:41 -0800
From: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
To: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
List Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux@....linux.org.uk, Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
r.herring@...escale.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
daniel@...aq.de, bryan.wu@...onical.com, valentin.longchamp@...l.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 01/11] arm: mxc: TrustZone interrupt controller (TZIC)
for i.MX5 family
> >> > +config MXC_TZIC
> >> > + bool "Enable TrustZone Interrupt Controller"
> >> > + depends on ARCH_MX51
> >>
> >> This is the first patch of the base port, yet I cannot find any reference to
> >> this ARCH_MX51, did you miss something?
> >
> > ARCH_MX51 is only introduced in the later patches that add the core i.MX5
> > code. Since TZIC is not inherently dependent on i.MX5 (it's merely the first
> > processor to use it), I thought of splitting it out as a separate patch.
> >
> > Does this break the sanctity of one self-contained change?
> >
>
> This breaks git-bisect, we may want a buildable kernel every commit if possible.
>
Hmm... you may safely ignore this, it's not going to break the build
since it won't be selected without ARCH_MX51 being defined.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists