lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100204171519.290781725@linux.site>
Date:	Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:12:26 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: [55/74] block: fix bio_add_page for non trivial merge_bvec_fn case

2.6.32-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>

commit 1d6165851cd8e3f919d446cd6da35dee44e8837e upstream.

We have to properly decrease bi_size in order to merge_bvec_fn return
right result.  Otherwise this result in false merge rejects for two
absolutely valid bio_vecs.  This may cause significant performance
penalty for example fs_block_size == 1k and block device is raid0 with
small chunk_size = 8k. Then it is impossible to merge 7-th fs-block in
to bio which already has 6 fs-blocks.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 fs/bio.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/bio.c
+++ b/fs/bio.c
@@ -542,13 +542,18 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request
 
 		if (page == prev->bv_page &&
 		    offset == prev->bv_offset + prev->bv_len) {
+			unsigned int prev_bv_len = prev->bv_len;
 			prev->bv_len += len;
 
 			if (q->merge_bvec_fn) {
 				struct bvec_merge_data bvm = {
+					/* prev_bvec is already charged in
+					   bi_size, discharge it in order to
+					   simulate merging updated prev_bvec
+					   as new bvec. */
 					.bi_bdev = bio->bi_bdev,
 					.bi_sector = bio->bi_sector,
-					.bi_size = bio->bi_size,
+					.bi_size = bio->bi_size - prev_bv_len,
 					.bi_rw = bio->bi_rw,
 				};
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ