[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B6B0450.4000507@billgatliff.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:30:56 -0600
From: Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>
To: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
CC: linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PWM PATCH 1/5] API to consolidate PWM devices behind a common
user and kernel interface
Bill Gatliff wrote:
> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>
>> Your older patch just used printk's to output the messages. I think the
>> Oops is being caused by the dev_<level>(pwm->dev, ...). Where is pwm->dev
>> being setup?
>>
>>
>
> The intention was to save the result from device_create() called from
> __pwm_create_sysfs(), but I'm suspicious that the patch I posted doesn't
> have that code for some reason. My local git repo here doesn't seem to
> have it. Hmmm...
>
No, that's not right. Disregard the above.
If the PWM device in question is already known to the kernel, then
before you call pwm_register() you must set pwm->dev to the address of
that device structure. I need to come up with a better way to handle this.
If the PWM device isn't already known to the kernel as a true struct
device, then I don't yet have a Plan B. Drat. :(
b.g.
--
Bill Gatliff
bgat@...lgatliff.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists