[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B6A316B.3040509@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:31:07 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: using O_LARGEFILE to open perf data file
- fix
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> Setting _FILE_OFFSET_BITS and using O_LARGEFILE, lseek64, etc, is
>> redundant. Thanks H. Peter Anvin for point out
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 3 +--
>> tools/perf/util/header.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
>> tools/perf/util/session.c | 3 +--
>> tools/perf/util/trace-event-read.c | 14 +++++++-------
>> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> i already applied the v1 patch - mind sending a delta patch that removes the
> redundant definitions?
>
Hi Ingo,
This patch is the delta patch, i used the _FILE_OFFSET_BITS defining and removed
O_LARGEFILE/lseek64 to keep code clean.
I'll integrate Peter's comments and send the new version.
Thanks,
Xiao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists