linux-kernel - Re: patch net-restore-ip-source-validation.patch added to 2.6.32-stable tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100204.101916.180396428.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:19:16 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	hadi@...erus.ca
Cc:	s.L-H@....de, gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: patch net-restore-ip-source-validation.patch added to
 2.6.32-stable tree

From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:14:07 -0500

> On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 18:50 +0100, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>> sysctl table check failed
> 
> Can you look at your patched source include/linux/sysctl.h
> and see whether you see the following lines:
> ----
>         NET_IPV4_CONF_ARP_ACCEPT=21,
>         NET_IPV4_CONF_ARP_NOTIFY=22,
>         NET_IPV4_CONF_ACCEPT_LOCAL=23,
>         NET_IPV4_CONF_SRC_VMARK=24,
>         __NET_IPV4_CONF_MAX
> ---
> 
> I have a feeling you are missing NET_IPV4_CONF_ACCEPT_LOCAL

Do they really have to be contiguous?  That's a strange
requirement.

Yes, NET_IPV4_CONF_ACCEPT_LOCAL isn't there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/