linux-kernel - Re: patch net-restore-ip-source-validation.patch added to 2.6.32-stable tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1265308725.4651.14.camel@bigi>
Date:	Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:38:45 -0500
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.L-H@....de>
Cc:	gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: patch net-restore-ip-source-validation.patch added to
 2.6.32-stable tree

On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 19:31 +0100, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Thursday 04 February 2010, jamal wrote:

> > ----
> >         NET_IPV4_CONF_ARP_ACCEPT=21,
> >         NET_IPV4_CONF_ARP_NOTIFY=22,
> >         NET_IPV4_CONF_ACCEPT_LOCAL=23,
> >         NET_IPV4_CONF_SRC_VMARK=24,
> >         __NET_IPV4_CONF_MAX
> > ---
> > 
> > I have a feeling you are missing NET_IPV4_CONF_ACCEPT_LOCAL
> 
> Yes, you're 100% right - such a hunk is missing from queue-2.6.32 [1]
> 

Do you mind changing to NET_IPV4_CONF_SRC_VMARK=23 in that patch?
As i mentioned in my other email it is a wild guess - so it likely will
have no effect but worth a try if you have time.

cheers,
jamal



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/