[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100204194851.GA12121@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:48:51 -0200
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
To: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@...dau.phys.spbu.ru>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] perf annotate: fix it for non-prelinked *.so
Em Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:34:04PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov escreveu:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 07:31:46AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Monkey see monkey do.
> >
> > perf tools: fix perf top module symbol annotation.
> > "objdump --start-address=0x%016Lx "
> > "--stop-address=0x%016Lx -dS %s",
> > - map->unmap_ip(map, sym->start),
> > - map->unmap_ip(map, sym->end), path);
> > + map__rip_2objdump(map, sym->start),
> > + map__rip_2objdump(map, sym->end), path);
>
> If I recall correctly, that's not enough.
>
> The problem is top code is also wrong at mapping objdump addresses to
> absolute ip. That is another part of builtin-top.c which does
> map->unmap_ip(), and I've already suggested a fix back at holidays:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126295508002536&w=2
Yeah, I was looking at Mike's report about 'perf annotate' not working
with modules, debugged, wrote a patch that looed at the ELF header obj
type as the key to apply or not the unmap_ip operation and when it was
working I thought I saw that patch somewhere, looked at yours and
applied it instead.
Then I was testing your subsequent patches but had to call it a day,
sent what I had that at least fixed 'annotate' and Mike took it from
there.
Looking at this now.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists