[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1002050817120.3356@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 08:17:59 +1100 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>
cc: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@...il.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@...insight.net>,
David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
Robin Getz <rgetz@...log.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@...ericable.fr>,
"David P. Quigley" <dpquigl@...ho.nsa.gov>,
LKLM <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] syslog: distinguish between /proc/kmsg and
syscalls
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 08:58:43AM +0100, Alex Riesen wrote:
> > > + /* /proc/kmsg can open be opened by CAP_SYS_ADMIN */
> > > + if (type != 1 && from_file)
> > > + return 0;
> >
> > "can open be opened"?
>
> Erk, sorry. s/open //
>
> James, do you want a patch for that?
I guess... and 'opened with' might be better.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists