[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100204222522.GF20379@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 22:25:22 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@....de>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
stable-review@...nel.org, stable@...nel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] Fix 'flush_old_exec()/setup_new_exec()' split
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 11:11 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >
> > It seems they are all there, but on my system with 64-bit kernel and
> > 32-bit userland, 2.6.32.8-rc1 still panics in the way noticed by Ben.
>
> Ok. Greg - please skip these patches from stable for now. I'll try to
> figure out what's up.
>
> Sven/Ben: is /sbin/init (or wherever debian puts it) a regular ELF file?
> Shared libraries? Anything at all special about it? I wonder why it seems
> to have issues, when other 32-bit programs don't.
In a Debian initramfs, /init is a script interpreted by /bin/sh.
I've now tested i386 userland on an x86_64 kernel with all the relevant
patches on top of 2.6.32.7:
fdpic-respect-pt_gnu_stack-exec-protection-markings-when-creating-nommu-stack.patch
split-flush_old_exec-into-two-functions.patch
sparc-tif_abi_pending-bit-removal.patch
x86-get-rid-of-the-insane-tif_abi_pending-bit.patch
fix-flush_old_exec-setup_new_exec-split.patch
powerpc-tif_abi_pending-bit-removal.patch
This works perfectly, so far as I can see.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
friends: People who know you well, but like you anyway.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (828 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists