linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm 3/4] alpha: remove dma_sync_single

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100203200851.9c42c917.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:08:51 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
Cc:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 3/4] alpha: remove dma_sync_single_range

On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 23:06:37 -0500 Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:13 PM, FUJITA Tomonori
> <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > dma_sync_single_for_cpu/for_device supports a partial sync so there is
> > no point to have dma_sync_single_range (also dma_sync_single was
> > obsoleted long ago, replaced with dma_sync_single_for_cpu/for_device).
> >
> > There is no user of dma_sync_single_range() in mainline and only Alpha
> > architecture supports dma_sync_single_range(). So it's unlikely that
> > someone out of the tree uses it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
> > Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
> > Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
> > Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/alpha/include/asm/dma-mapping.h |    1 -
> >  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> > index 04eb568..f514ede 100644
> > --- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> > +++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> > @@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
> >
> >  #define dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, addr, size, dir)    ((void)0)
> >  #define dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, addr, size, dir)  ((void)0)
> > -#define dma_sync_single_range(dev, addr, off, size, dir)  ((void)0)
> >  #define dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(dev, sg, nents, dir)         ((void)0)
> >  #define dma_sync_sg_for_device(dev, sg, nents, dir)      ((void)0)
> >  #define dma_cache_sync(dev, va, size, dir)               ((void)0)
> > --
> > 1.5.6.5
> 
> Acked-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
> 
> Should I vacuum this one up, or should it go in the -mm tree? I don't
> guess there's much point in sending Linus pull requests for single
> patches.
> 

I'll grab it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/