| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:54:58 -0800 (PST) From: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> To: "Lu, Hongjiu" <hongjiu.lu@...el.com> Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Lachner, Peter" <peter.lachner@...el.com> Subject: RE: [patch] x86: ptrace and core-dump extensions for xstate > To support XSAVE, gdb needs to know XCR0 as well as XSTATE size. > We can get those info from kernel via system call or cpuid. I > prefer cpuid over system call. Suresh's patch puts this value in the xsave block, in what Suresh calls "sw_usable_bytes". See the asm/ptrace-abi.h comment in the patch you signed off on. How is that not sufficient? If it is indeed not sufficient to usefully interpret the xsave block, then how could an xsave block in a core dump file ever possibly be examined if it might not have been generated on the same system and kernel where the debugger is doing the examination? If the NT_X86_XSTATE note as implemented in Suresh's patch is indeed not entirely self-contained in this way, then NAK on that new note format. Thanks, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists