[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B6BD0C8.5020400@crca.org.au>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:03:20 +1100
From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Add sysfs switch for disabling
device run-time PM (rev. 2)
Hi Pavel et al.
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> /*
>> + * control - Report/change current runtime PM setting of the device
>> + *
>> + * Runtime power management of a device can be blocked with the help of
>> + * this attribute. All devices have one of the following two values for
>> + * the power/control file:
>> + *
>> + * + "auto\n" to allow the device to be power managed at run time;
>> + * + "on\n" to prevent the device from being power managed at run time;
>
> I find interface with mandatory \n quite 'interesting'.
Agreed.
> Plus english is strange here. All devices have ... "auto" to allow...?
> Strange formulation. List the values first, then add "write ... to allow"?
It seems okay to me because of the preceding sentence ending in a colon.
Regards,
Nigel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists