[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1265381604.22001.682.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:53:24 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] tracing: Introduce TRACE_EVENT_INJECT
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 09:47 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 10:14 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > TRACE_EVENT_INJECT macro is the same as TRACE_EVENT but takes one
>
> > #undef DEFINE_EVENT
> > #define DEFINE_EVENT(template, call, proto, args) \
> > static void ftrace_profile_##call(proto) \
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> > index 189b09b..5c75cc7 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> > @@ -142,6 +142,9 @@ static int ftrace_event_enable_disable(struct ftrace_event_call *call,
> > break;
> > }
> > call->enabled = 1;
> > +
> > + if (call->inject)
> > + call->inject();
> > }
> > break;
> > }
>
> With the proposal I'm suggesting:
>
> register_event_command(event, NULL, NULL, inject_me, inject_me, data);
>
> The above would do basically what this patch does. When ever the event
> is enabled or disabled the inject_me function will be called.
>
> Would this work?
No, because a dump all inject sucks chunks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists