[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1002051336360.12934@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 13:40:21 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] Export unusable free space index via
/proc/pagetypeinfo
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > + /*
> > > + * Index should be a value between 0 and 1. Return a value to 3
> > > + * decimal places.
> > > + *
> > > + * 0 => no fragmentation
> > > + * 1 => high fragmentation
> > > + */
> > > + return ((info->free_pages - (info->free_blocks_suitable << order)) * 1000) / info->free_pages;
> > > +
> >
> > This value is only for userspace consumption via /proc/pagetypeinfo, so
> > I'm wondering why it needs to be exported as an index. Other than a loss
> > of precision, wouldn't this be easier to understand (especially when
> > coupled with the free page counts already exported) if it were multipled
> > by 100 rather than 1000 and shown as a percent of _usable_ free memory at
> > each order?
>
> I find it easier to understand either way, but that's hardly a surprise.
> The 1000 is because of the loss of precision. I can make it a 100 but I
> don't think it makes much of a difference.
>
This suggestion was coupled with the subsequent note that there is no
documentation of what "unusuable free space index" is, except by the
implementation itself. Since the value isn't used by the kernel, I think
exporting the value as a percent would be easier understood by the user
without looking up the semantics. I don't have strong feelings either
way, however.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists