[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100206190117.6fc3be63@hyperion.delvare>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 19:01:17 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: "Chris Verges" <chrisv@...erswitching.com>
Cc: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>,
Rob Owings <rowings@...rmistor.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] linux-2.6.32-directemp
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 08:58:14 -0800, Chris Verges wrote:
> > Wouldn't it make sense to make use of hardware monitoring interfaces so
> > lm_sensors could handle the sensor information? (added to CC)
> >
> > This would also be a good reason to have the driver on kernel side
> > rather than somewhere in userspace.
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> I agree. However, I've had other drivers in the past been pooh-pooh'd by the lm-sensors maintainers because they don't seem to fit exactly what the lm-sensors folks want in a driver. Unfortunately, I seem to be bad at understanding the purpose of lm-sensors. :-) I'd like to get their approval before any work is done to migrate over to lm-sensors.
I can see that you tried to submit a driver for an accelerometer chip.
This indeed did not quite fit in the hwmon subsystem (although for
historical and unfortunate reasons we have a couple of them sitting
there at the moment... they should really go away!)
Temperature sensors definitely fit in the hwmon subsystem.
Humidity sensors... why not, we have already one.
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists