linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] correct onstack wait_queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2674af741002051640q40cd157cj6af95f112cf50025@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 6 Feb 2010 08:40:10 +0800
From:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] correct onstack wait_queue_head declaration

On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 21:52 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
>> Onstack wait_queue_head must be declared with
>> DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK. Otherwise it will make lockdep
>> warn. So fix the wrong usage in this patchset.
>>
>> BTW, I split it to 4 patches to send to different maintainer
>> though it's due to the same issue. If you have no objection
>> on this kind of fix, I can also send it in one patch for some
>> simplification.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
>
> --no-chain-reply-to

Thanks for your reminder.  :)

Regards,
Yong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/