[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100207171615.GA9854@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 18:16:15 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Frank Heckenbach <f.heckenbach@...soft.de>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] coredump: set ->group_exit_code for other CLONE_VM tasks
too
User visible change.
do_coredump() kills all threads which share the same ->mm but only
the coredumping process gets the proper exit_code. Other tasks which
share the same ->mm die "silently" and return status == 0 to parent.
This is historical behaviour, not actually a bug. But I think Frank
Heckenbach rightly dislikes the current behaviour. Simple test-case:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
int main(void)
{
int stat;
if (!fork()) {
if (!vfork())
kill(getpid(), SIGQUIT);
}
wait(&stat);
printf("stat=%x\n", stat);
return 0;
}
Before this patch it prints "stat=0" despite the fact the child was
killed by SIGQUIT. After this patch the output is "stat=3" which
obviously makes more sense.
Even with this patch, only the task which originates the coredumping
gets "|= 0x80" if the core was actually dumped, but at least the
coredumping signal is visible to do_wait/etc.
Reported-by: Frank Heckenbach <f.heckenbach@...soft.de>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
fs/exec.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- V1/fs/exec.c~CD_STATUS 2009-12-18 00:20:50.000000000 +0100
+++ V1/fs/exec.c 2010-02-07 17:28:24.000000000 +0100
@@ -1536,12 +1536,13 @@ out:
return ispipe;
}
-static int zap_process(struct task_struct *start)
+static int zap_process(struct task_struct *start, int exit_code)
{
struct task_struct *t;
int nr = 0;
start->signal->flags = SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT;
+ start->signal->group_exit_code = exit_code;
start->signal->group_stop_count = 0;
t = start;
@@ -1566,8 +1567,7 @@ static inline int zap_threads(struct tas
spin_lock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
if (!signal_group_exit(tsk->signal)) {
mm->core_state = core_state;
- tsk->signal->group_exit_code = exit_code;
- nr = zap_process(tsk);
+ nr = zap_process(tsk, exit_code);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
if (unlikely(nr < 0))
@@ -1616,7 +1616,7 @@ static inline int zap_threads(struct tas
if (p->mm) {
if (unlikely(p->mm == mm)) {
lock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
- nr += zap_process(p);
+ nr += zap_process(p, exit_code);
unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
}
break;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists