[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100207124126.GA23725@8bytes.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 13:41:26 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] kvm: Change kvm_iommu_map_pages to map large
pages
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 02:22:35PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/05/2010 01:01 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, addresses the concern.
>>>
>> Are there any further objections against this patchset? If not it would
>> be cool if you could give me some acks for the kvm specific parts of
>> this patchset.
>>
>
> There are two ways we can get the kvm bits in:
>
> - you publish a git tree excluding the kvm patches, I merge your tree,
> then apply the kvm specific patches. This is best for avoiding
> merge-time conflicts if I get other patches for the same area.
> - you push everything including the kvm bits.
>
> I'm fine with both, though prefer the former. If you choose the latter,
> ACK for the kvm patches.
Hmm, the patch set is self-contained and hard to split. We had the same
problem with the initial iommu-api merge. Since I have further updates
for the AMD IOMMU driver I think its best to send the these patches and
my updates directly to Linus after the KVM updates are merged in the
next merge window. Thanks for your ACKs :-)
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists