[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1002081038430.2811@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:06:58 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: clocksource mutex deadlock, cat current_clocksource
(2.6.33-rc6/7)
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > Nope, the NMI watchdog is not involved. It merily tells us that the
> > task is stuck.
>
> OK.
> And after that message debug_locks is zeroed and kwatchdog is gone
> from the process list (probably during debug_locks change).
Oh, no. kwatchdog is a run once thread. It always exits after work is
done, but I'm pretty confused about the NMI watchdog output.
EIP: 0060:[<c1045170>] EFLAGS: 00000082 CPU: 0
EIP is at timekeeping_forward_now+0x116/0x139
I don't see what might make the machine stuck here. Can you decode the
source line with "addr2line -e vmlinux c1045170" please ?
> I'll explain what I think might be happening:
> bootup switches to acpi_pm, timekeeping gets borked, NMI watchdog complains
> due to timekeeping issues, brutally yanks the waiting acpi_pm switchover
> (thereby NOT releasing clocksource_mutex),
No, the NMI watchdog does not yank anything. It just reports.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists