[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100208135629.GD4321@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:56:29 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Christoph Egger <siccegge@...d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Kazuo Moriwaka <moriwaka@...hat.com>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Joel Becker <joel.becker@...cle.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, vamos@...informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] obsolete config in kernel source (BUFFER_DEBUG)
On Fri 05-02-10 14:13:33, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> As part of the VAMOS[0] research project at the University of
> Erlangen we're checking referential integrity between kernel KConfig
> options and in-code Conditional blocks.
>
> With some commit somewhere around 2.4.15 the last hint of
> CONFIG_BUFFER_DEBUG (apart from the 2 occurences this patch addresses)
> -- some documentation -- was removed from the kernel source. However
> this one piece of code made it till today. Time to go forward and
> remove it?
>
> Please keep me informed of this patch getting confirmed /
> merged so we can keep track of it.
Thanks, the patch looks good. I've merged it into my linux-fs tree and
will send it to Linus in the next merge window.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists