[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8111.1265649927@localhost>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:25:27 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.33-rc6 - BUG at drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:88
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:26:32 +0100, Thomas Renninger said:
> On Thursday 04 February 2010 17:00:02 Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> > Hit this one again while setting up to bisect another issue. I've verified
> > that the fix *is* someplace in 2.6.33-rc6-mmotm0201 (as that one lives at least
> > all the way to single-user mode), so I'm basically asking that somebody find
> > the commit that fixes it and make sure it gets into 2.6.33-final. I'd offer
> > the commit number for the fix, but I'm hoping somebody recognizes it and pushes
> > it so I don't have bisect to find the fixing commit.
> >
> > Thomas? Did you have a fix for this that hasn't been pulled by Linus yet?
> The fix is to remove the patch.
>
> > Refresher: The bad commit was:
> >
> > commit 46aeb7430f79cb4d03e17fedd6399884ab3aa697
> > Author: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
> > Date: Mon Dec 14 11:44:11 2009 +0100
> >
> > [CPUFREQ] Fix race in cpufreq_update_policy()
> This one never hit Linus tree?
> It was in -mm, but got reverted.
>
> Did you bisect on another tree?
Good catch, Thomas.
Looks like a miscue on my part - although the timestamp on the vmlinuz in /boot
matched the one in arch/x86/boot/bzImage, the file size matched the one left
at the end of that bisect from last time. Looks like I managed to cd into the
wrong /usr/src/linux-* when I copied the bzImage to /boot.
"D'Oh!" - H. Simpson.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists