[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100208182816.GD1469@ucw.cz>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 19:28:16 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.33-rc7
Hi!
> > When I grab tarballs, I only grab .gz. Bandwidth isn't a
> > problem (3 minutes versus four on my DSL, I still switch over to another
> > screen and check back). But .bz2 unpacks very slowly in the
> > environments I'm usually grabbing a tarball for. I save more time
> > unpacking .gz than I do downloading .bz2.
>
> Ok, there seems to be a fair number of people who prefer .gz files for
> whatever reason.
>
> So I guess I'll stay with the current setup. It's only (somebody elses)
> diskspace, after all.
>
> Another option might be to stop generating the .bz2 files, of
> course.
It would be good to keep ketchup working.
> Anybody who cares more about network bandwidth than CPU use (ie people who
> would seem to prefer bz2) would be better off using git instead, which
> packs things _way_ better, by virtue of being much more incremental.
Well, yes, but git did really badly on arm/128MB machine when I
tried. What would be *really* nice... could we get -rc-s relative to
each other?
That would help a lot. Of course, git wins when you only produce diffs
against .X release, but... That would be 80% bandwidth saving against
current situation and still cpu-friendly.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists