[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100208150834.17756314@jbarnes-piketon>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:08:34 -0800
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Haight <peterh@...ros.com>,
Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] PCI: try "pci=use_crs" again
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:44:18 -0700
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com> wrote:
> Historically, Linux has assumed a single PCI host bridge, with that
> bridge claiming all the address space left after RAM and legacy
> devices are taken out.
>
> If the system contains multiple host bridges, we can no longer
> operate under that assumption. We have to know what parts of the
> address space are claimed by each bridge so that when we assign
> resources to a PCI device, we take them from a range claimed by the
> upstream host bridge.
>
> We use ACPI to enumerate all the PCI host bridges in the system, and
> part of the host bridge description is the "_CRS" (current resource
> settings" property, which lists the address space used by the
> bridge. On x86, we currently ignore most of the _CRS information.
> This patch series changes this, so we will use _CRS to learn about
> the host bridge windows.
>
> Since most x86 machines with multiple host bridges are relatively
> new, this series only turns this on for machines with BIOS dates of
> 2010 or newer and for a few machines we know to require it.
>
> These apply on be6e9f7853e. I added an initial patch to clean up the
> formatting of the disabled window printk.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - rebase to be6e9f7853e
> - add patch to clean up "disabled window" printk
> - add bugzilla reference comment in use_crs DMI quirk
A 2010 default is probably too conservative, but we can always add a
whitelist or change the default later. Applied the series to my
linux-next branch, thanks.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists