[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1265716376.24394.32669.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:52:56 +0000
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To: Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@...citrix.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] xen: Make event channel work with PV featured HVM
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 08:05 +0000, Sheng Yang wrote:
> + if (xen_hvm_pv_evtchn_enabled()) {
> + if (enable_hvm_pv(HVM_PV_EVTCHN))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +[...]
> + callback_via = HVM_CALLBACK_VECTOR(X86_PLATFORM_IPI_VECTOR);
> + set_callback_via(callback_via);
> +
> + x86_platform_ipi_callback = do_hvm_pv_evtchn_intr;
Why this indirection via X86_PLATFORM_IPI_VECTOR?
Apart from that why not use CALLBACKOP_register subop CALLBACKTYPE_event
pointing to xen_hypervisor_callback the same as a full PV guest?
This would remove all the evtchn related code from HVMOP_enable_pv which
I think should be eventually unnecessary as an independent hypercall
since all HVM guests should simply be PV capable by default -- the
hypervisor only needs to track if the guest has made use of specific PV
functionality, not the umbrella "is PV" state.
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists