[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1265735092.2551.1835.camel@rchatre-DESK>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:04:52 -0800
From: reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"lkml@...nk-Future.de" <lkml@...nk-Future.de>,
Linux Kernel-Liste <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ilw@...ux.intel.com" <ilw@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: iwlagn kernel 2.6.32.3 ooops
Hi Stanislaw,
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 08:52 -0800, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>
> > > [250420.677168] Pid: 11584, comm: ip Not tainted 2.6.32.3 #5
> > > [250420.677173] Call Trace:
> > > [250420.677190] [<c10a53f8>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x518/0x5f0
> > > [250420.677204] [<c1007c20>] ? dma_generic_alloc_coherent+0x0/0x100
> > > [250420.677214] [<c1007c92>] ? dma_generic_alloc_coherent+0x72/0x100
> > > [250420.677224] [<c1007c20>] ? dma_generic_alloc_coherent+0x0/0x100
> > > [250420.677241] [<fca1c9d5>] ? iwl_tx_queue_init+0x285/0x380 [iwlcore]
>
> That is at initialization time. To avoid atomic allocation we can just
> use dma_alloc_coherent instead of pci_alloc_consistent. I'm going to
> prepare a patch.
I do not understand your goal here ... as seen in this trace
pci_alloc_consistent itself already calls dma_alloc_coherent right away.
Reinette
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists