[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fa686aa41002090913t4c72a3b8o5fda68723bc8d089@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 10:13:11 -0700
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] of/gpio: Implement GPIOLIB notifier hooks
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Anton Vorontsov
<avorontsov@...mvista.com> wrote:
> This patch implements GPIOLIB notifier hooks, and thus makes device-enabled
> GPIO chips (i.e. the ones that have gpio_chip->dev specified) automatically
> attached to the OpenFirmware subsystem. Which means that now we can handle
> I2C and SPI GPIO chips almost* transparently.
>
> * "Almost" because some chips still require platform data, and for these
> chips OF-glue is still needed, though with this support the glue will
> be much smaller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
> ---
> +static struct notifier_block of_gpio_nb = {
> + .notifier_call = of_gpio_notify,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init of_gpio_notifier_init(void)
> +{
> + return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&gpio_notifier, &of_gpio_nb);
> +}
> +arch_initcall(of_gpio_notifier_init);
Another concern; if any gpio chips get registered before this
arch_initcall (not sure if it is possible or not), then those chips
won't get registered with the of gpio infrastructure.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists