lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100209083116.GD29988@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:01:16 +0530
From:	Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arun Bharadwaj <arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [v11 PATCH 3/9]: cpuidle: implement a list based approach to
 register a set of idle routines

* Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2010-02-09 13:58:16]:

Implement a list based registering mechanism for architectures which
have multiple sets of idle routines which are to be registered.

Currently, in x86 it is done by merely setting pm_idle = idle_routine
and managing this pm_idle pointer is messy.

To give an example of how this mechanism works:
In x86, initially, idle routine is selected from the set of poll/mwait/
c1e/default idle loops. So the selected idle loop is registered in cpuidle
as one idle state cpuidle devices. Once ACPI comes up, it registers
another set of idle states on top of this state. Again, suppose a module
registers another set of idle loops, it is added to this list.

This provides a clean way of registering and unregistering idle state
routines.

In the current implementation, pm_idle is set as the current idle routine
being used and the old idle routine has to be maintained and when a module
registers/unregisters an idle routine, confusion arises.


Signed-off-by: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c |   54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 include/linux/cpuidle.h   |    1 
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: linux.trees.git/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
===================================================================
--- linux.trees.git.orig/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
+++ linux.trees.git/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 #include "cpuidle.h"
 
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_device *, cpuidle_devices);
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct list_head, cpuidle_devices_list);
 
 DEFINE_MUTEX(cpuidle_lock);
 
@@ -129,6 +130,45 @@ void cpuidle_resume_and_unlock(void)
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_resume_and_unlock);
 
+int cpuidle_add_to_list(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
+{
+	int ret, cpu = dev->cpu;
+	struct cpuidle_device *old_dev;
+
+	if (!list_empty(&per_cpu(cpuidle_devices_list, cpu))) {
+		old_dev = list_first_entry(&per_cpu(cpuidle_devices_list, cpu),
+				struct cpuidle_device, idle_list);
+		cpuidle_remove_state_sysfs(old_dev);
+	}
+
+	list_add(&dev->idle_list, &per_cpu(cpuidle_devices_list, cpu));
+	ret = cpuidle_add_state_sysfs(dev);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+void cpuidle_remove_from_list(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
+{
+	struct cpuidle_device *temp_dev;
+	struct list_head *pos;
+	int ret, cpu = dev->cpu;
+
+	list_for_each(pos, &per_cpu(cpuidle_devices_list, cpu)) {
+		temp_dev = container_of(pos, struct cpuidle_device, idle_list);
+		if (dev == temp_dev) {
+			list_del(&temp_dev->idle_list);
+			cpuidle_remove_state_sysfs(temp_dev);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (!list_empty(&per_cpu(cpuidle_devices_list, cpu))) {
+		temp_dev = list_first_entry(&per_cpu(cpuidle_devices_list, cpu),
+					struct cpuidle_device, idle_list);
+		ret = cpuidle_add_state_sysfs(temp_dev);
+	}
+	cpuidle_kick_cpus();
+}
+
 /**
  * cpuidle_enable_device - enables idle PM for a CPU
  * @dev: the CPU
@@ -153,9 +193,6 @@ int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle
 			return ret;
 	}
 
-	if ((ret = cpuidle_add_state_sysfs(dev)))
-		return ret;
-
 	if (cpuidle_curr_governor->enable &&
 	    (ret = cpuidle_curr_governor->enable(dev)))
 		goto fail_sysfs;
@@ -174,7 +211,7 @@ int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle
 	return 0;
 
 fail_sysfs:
-	cpuidle_remove_state_sysfs(dev);
+	cpuidle_remove_from_list(dev);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -199,8 +236,6 @@ void cpuidle_disable_device(struct cpuid
 
 	if (cpuidle_curr_governor->disable)
 		cpuidle_curr_governor->disable(dev);
-
-	cpuidle_remove_state_sysfs(dev);
 }
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_disable_device);
@@ -271,6 +306,7 @@ int cpuidle_register_device(struct cpuid
 	}
 
 	cpuidle_enable_device(dev);
+	cpuidle_add_to_list(dev);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&cpuidle_lock);
 
@@ -292,6 +328,7 @@ void cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cp
 	cpuidle_pause_and_lock();
 
 	cpuidle_disable_device(dev);
+	cpuidle_remove_from_list(dev);
 
 	per_cpu(cpuidle_devices, dev->cpu) = NULL;
 
@@ -342,12 +379,15 @@ static inline void latency_notifier_init
  */
 static int __init cpuidle_init(void)
 {
-	int ret;
+	int ret, cpu;
 
 	ret = cpuidle_add_class_sysfs(&cpu_sysdev_class);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&per_cpu(cpuidle_devices_list, cpu));
+
 	latency_notifier_init(&cpuidle_latency_notifier);
 
 	return 0;
Index: linux.trees.git/include/linux/cpuidle.h
===================================================================
--- linux.trees.git.orig/include/linux/cpuidle.h
+++ linux.trees.git/include/linux/cpuidle.h
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ struct cpuidle_device {
 	struct cpuidle_state_kobj *kobjs[CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX];
 	struct cpuidle_state	*last_state;
 
+	struct list_head	idle_list;
 	struct kobject		kobj;
 	struct completion	kobj_unregister;
 	void			*governor_data;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ