[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1265705671.11509.177.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:54:31 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC perf,x86] P4 PMU early draft
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 15:23 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 09:45:04PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
> > The main problem in implementing P4 PMU is that it has much more
> > restrictions for event to MSR mapping. So to fit into current
> > perf_events model I made the following:
>
> Is there somewhere accessible on the web where I can read about the P4
> PMU? I'm interested to see if the constraint representation and
> search I used on the POWER processors would be applicable.
Mostly:
http://www.intel.com/Assets/PDF/manual/253669.pdf
Section 30.8 PERFORMANCE MONITORING (PROCESSORS
BASED ON INTEL NETBURST MICROARCHITECTURE)
Section 30.9 PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND INTEL HYPER-
THREADING TECHNOLOGY IN PROCESSORS BASED
ON INTEL NETBURST MICROARCHITECTURE
Section A.8 PENTIUM 4 AND INTEL XEON PROCESSOR PERFORMANCE-MONITORING
EVENTS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists