lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100210100428.GL30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:04:28 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	zbr@...emap.net
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [WTF] ... is going on with current->fs->{root,mnt} accesses in
 pohmelfs

a) pohmelfs_construct_path_string() will do interesting things if you
call it while chrooted into jail and pohmelfs mounted deeper in that
jail.  Try it.

b) just why do we care about root of chroot jail in pohmelfs_path_length()?
Not to mention anything else, current->fs->root/mnt may be changed under
you if you share current->fs with another thread, but even aside of that,
why does filesystem care about chroot of caller at all?

What's going on there?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ