[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100210112822.GB4546@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:28:22 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, hjl.tools@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch v2 2/4] x86, ptrace: regset extensions to support xstate
On 02/09, Suresh Siddha wrote:
>
> +int xstateregs_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
> + unsigned int pos, unsigned int count,
> + void *kbuf, void __user *ubuf)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + int size = regset->n * regset->size;
> + struct xsave_hdr_struct *xsave_hdr =
> + &target->thread.xstate->xsave.xsave_hdr;
> +
> + if (!cpu_has_xsave)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + ret = init_fpu(target);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * First copy the fxsave bytes 0..463
> + */
> + ret = user_regset_copyout(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf,
> + &target->thread.xstate->xsave, 0,
> + offsetof(struct i387_fxsave_struct,
> + sw_reserved));
> + if (!ret)
> + /*
> + * Copy the 48bytes defined by software
> + */
> + ret = user_regset_copyout(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf,
> + xstate_fx_sw_bytes,
> + offsetof(struct i387_fxsave_struct,
> + sw_reserved),
> + offsetof(struct xsave_struct,
> + xsave_hdr));
Hmm. Suresh, could you confirm these offsetof's are correct?
We are copying xstate_fx_sw_bytes array which is u64[6], but
start_pos == sizeof(i387_fxsave_struct) - padding ?
While we are here. Perhaps it would be more symmetrical to do
ret = user_regset_copyout();
if (ret)
return ret;
instead of "if (!ret)" which needs a tab, but this is up to you.
> + if (!ret)
> + /*
> + * Copy the rest of xstate memory layout
> + */
> + ret = user_regset_copyout(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf,
> + xsave_hdr,
Another very minor nit, this is the only user of xsave_hdr, but this
var was defined at the top. Perhaps it would be a bit more clean to
have
struct xsave_struct *xsave = target->thread.xstate->xsave;
and use it in 1st and 3rd copyout?
Speaking about the first user_regset_copyout(), perhaps xsave->i387
would be more clear than xsave?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists