[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100210141836.GA23861@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:18:36 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, hjl.tools@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch v2 2/4] x86, ptrace: regset extensions to support xstate
static inline int user_regset_copyout(unsigned int *pos, unsigned int *count,
void **kbuf,
void __user **ubuf, const void *data,
const int start_pos, const int end_pos)
{
if (*count == 0)
return 0;
BUG_ON(*pos < start_pos);
if (end_pos < 0 || *pos < end_pos) {
unsigned int copy = (end_pos < 0 ? *count
: min(*count, end_pos - *pos));
data += *pos - start_pos;
^^^
Is it correct? Shouldn't it be
data += *pos + start_pos;
?
Currently this doesn't matter, start_pos == 0 always. In fact I don't
understand why do we need this arg. In unlikely case the caller wants
to copy the part of *data, it can adjust data/end_pos itself.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists