[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1265764925.2833.15.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:22:05 -0800
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hjl.tools@...il.com" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v2 0/4] updated ptrace/core-dump patches for supporting
xstate - V2
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 17:12 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Patches are on top of the -tip/master tree.
> > First patch in the series reverts the first version of the patch that went into
> > the -tip tree.
>
> AFAIK tip/x86/ptrace is just a temporary branch containing nothing but your
> patch. So I imagine you don't need a reversion, Ingo et al will just put
> the new patches on a fresh replacement branch.
That is my understanding too but was not sure. Wanted to mention that
they should either replace the branch or apply the reverted patch
(incase if they have issues with replacing the branch). Peter, you seem
to have applied the revert. Can you instead start with a fresh branch so
that we can just ignore the first version (and hence skip first revert
patch in this series)?
> I'll reply to each patch individually.
Thanks Roland.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists