lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100210174826.GB10093@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:48:26 -0800
From:	Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME
	wake-up (rev. 7)

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 02:12:29AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 February 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 February 2010, Gary Hade wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 12:58:39PM -0800, Gary Hade wrote:
> > ...
> > > > OK.  I already confirmed that the problem reproduces with your
> > > > patches applied.  I am now in the process of trying vanilla
> > > > 2.6.33-rc7.  If hot-add works with 2.6.33-rc7 I will give
> > > > your patch a try.
> > > 
> > > The hot-add worked fine with an unpatched 2.6.33-rc7.
> > 
> > Good.
> > 
> > > The new patch when added to the 2.6.33-rc7 tree that
> > > included the original patchset unfortunately did not
> > > correct the problem.
> > 
> > Bad.
> > 
> > Well, fortunately I have another one, but I haven't tested it myself yet except
> > for checking that it builds.  Hopefully it won't break things more.
> > 
> > The patch below applies on top of 2.6.33-rc7 with my PCI runtime PM patchset
> > applied.  Please test it and let me know the results.
> 
> Sorry, I sent a wrong version of the patch by mistake, it doesn't even build.
> The correct one is appended.

No problem.  I received this message before doing anything with
the previous one.

Sorry, both hot-add and hot-remove behaviors appear unchanged
with this patch.

I would like to dig into the code and help with the debugging
but I am swamped with other things right now.  However, feel 
free to continue using me for testing if you have other ideas
you want me to try.

Gary

-- 
Gary Hade
System x Enablement
IBM Linux Technology Center
503-578-4503  IBM T/L: 775-4503
garyhade@...ibm.com
http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ