[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100210013224.DC3441C5@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 17:32:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, hjl.tools@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch v2 3/4] x86, ptrace: prepare regset get/set routines for user specified lengths
This change is unnecessary and IMHO misguided. The arch user_regset.get
and user_regset.set functions are not required to worry about bogus
arguments. Their callers are required to pass values that don't violate
the .n, .size, and .align constraints in the user_regset. The right place
to enforce these constraints on parameters coming from userland is in the
arch-independent code that calls the arch user_regset functions.
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists