linux-kernel - Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2010-02-10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100210.122540.149553948.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:25:40 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	linville@...driver.com
Cc:	johannes@...solutions.net, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mb@...sch.de
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2010-02-10

From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:19:54 -0500

> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:36:58AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
>> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:15:37 +0100
>> 
>> > It was intentional -- that sdev doesn't even have an irq member, but
>> > nobody ever noticed because of the wrong ifdef.
>> 
>> Ok, then this needs to be explained in the commit message.
> 
> OK...mind if I just revert the current version and ask Michael to
> resubmit with an appropriate changelog entry?

Have you pulled this tree into others already?  Why not
just pop out the commit and fix it's commit message, then
reapply?

Having the revert commit in there is really stupid just for this.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/