[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100210093140.12D9.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:32:07 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: tracking memory usage/leak in "inactive" field in /proc/meminfo?
> Hi,
>
> I'm hoping you can help me out. I'm on a 2.6.27 x86 system and I'm
> seeing the "inactive" field in /proc/meminfo slowly growing over time to
> the point where eventually the oom-killer kicks in and starts killing
> things. The growth is not evident in any other field in /proc/meminfo.
>
> I'm trying to figure out where the memory is going, and what it's being
> used for.
>
> As I've found, the fields in /proc/meminfo don't add up...in particular,
> active+inactive is quite a bit larger than
> buffers+cached+dirty+anonpages+mapped+pagetables+vmallocused. Initially
> the difference is about 156MB, but after about 13 hrs the difference is
> 240MB.
>
> How can I track down where this is going? Can you suggest any
> instrumentation that I can add?
>
> I'm reasonably capable, but I'm getting seriously confused trying to
> sort out the memory subsystem. Some pointers would be appreciated.
can you please post your /proc/meminfo?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists