[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1265885585.3389.38.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:53:05 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, adharmap@...eaurora.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] fix dma_map_sg not to do barriers for each buffer
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 10:45 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 21:21 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > @@ -345,6 +347,7 @@ static inline dma_addr_t dma_map_single(struct device *dev, void *cpu_addr,
> > BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(dir));
> >
> > __dma_single_cpu_to_dev(cpu_addr, size, dir);
> > + __dma_barrier(dir);
> >
> > return virt_to_dma(dev, cpu_addr);
> > }
>
> The ___dma_single_cpu_to_dev() covers both inner and outer caches but I
> haven't seen it touched by this patch (nor the other you posted). When
> you clean the L1 cache, you need to make sure that there is a barrier
> (DSB) so that it completes before cleaning the L2, otherwise you clean
> the L2 but data keeps coming from L1.
Actually after L2 maintenance we don't even need the __dma_barrier(), we
need an outer_cache.sync() function.
I can do the outer cache optimisations together with a few others for
PL310 (which does not require the cache_wait() call for line
operations).
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists