[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201002111425.01720.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:25:01 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Xin, Xiaohui" <xiaohui.xin@...el.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>, "mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"jdike@...user-mode-linux.org" <jdike@...user-mode-linux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Provide a zero-copy method on KVM virtio-net.
On Thursday 11 February 2010, Xin, Xiaohui wrote:
> >This does a lot of things that I had planned for macvtap. It's
> >great to hear that you have made this much progress.
> >
> >However, I'd hope that we could combine this with the macvtap driver,
> >which would give us zero-copy transfer capability both with and
> >without vhost, as well as (tx at least) when using multiple guests
> >on a macvlan setup.
>
> You mean the zero-copy can work with macvtap driver without vhost.
> May you give me some detailed info about your macvtap driver and the
> relationship between vhost and macvtap to make me have a clear picture then?
macvtap provides a user interface that is largely compatible with
the tun/tap driver, and can be used in place of that from qemu.
Vhost-net currently interfaces with tun/tap, but not yet with macvtap,
which is easy enough to add and already on my list.
The underlying code is macvlan, which is a driver that virtualizes
network adapters in software, giving you multiple net_device instances
for a real NIC, each of them with their own MAC address.
In order to do zero-copy transmit with macvtap, the idea is to
add a nonblocking version of the aio_write() function that works
a lot like your transmit function.
For receive, the hardware does not currently know which guest
is supposed to get any frame coming in from the outside. Adding
zero-copy receive requires interaction with the device driver
and hardware capabilities to separate traffic by inbound MAC
address into separate buffers per VM.
> >I'm assuming that the idea is to allow VMDq adapters to simply
> >show up as separate adapters and have the driver handle this
> >in a hardware specific way.
>
> Does the VMDq driver do so now?
I don't think anyone has published a VMDq capable driver so far.
I was just assuming that you were working on one.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists