linux-kernel - Re: [RFC perf,x86] P4 PMU early draft

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100211152220.GA5385@lenovo>
Date:	Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:22:20 +0300
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [RFC perf,x86] P4 PMU early draft

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:21:58PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 11:52 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > which suggests we should simply remove that cpu argument 
> 
> The below patch does so for all in-tree bits.
> 
> Doing this patch reminded me of the mess that is
> hw_perf_group_sched_in(), so I'm going to try and fix that next.
> 

Yes Peter, thanks! At least for me this patch makes code more
understandable :)

	-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/