[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100211172100.GA28533@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:21:00 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eugene Teo <eugene@...hat.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vfs: add NOFOLLOW flag to umount(2)
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:15:53PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> - renamed flag to UMOUNT_NOFOLLOW
> - added UMOUNT_UNUSED for feature detection
Umm, why? MNT_ certainly isn't the best naming for unmount flags,
but switching convention after we had a few doesn't make any sense.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists