[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1265854160-11763-1-git-send-email-opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 04:09:17 +0200
From: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>, netdev@...t.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, WANG Cong <amwang@...hat.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: [net-next PATCH v3 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers
This patch series is based on Amerigo's v2 but it now uses a bitmap
for port reservation.
I've ran a while (1) { bind(0) } test (with ip_local_port_range
1024 65000) to see if there is any performance difference between the
two approaches (ranges vs bitmap). I could not detect any significant
difference, both cases scored in 2.76s +/- 0.01 on my setup.
I've based this patch series on current net-next, but it contains a
significant non networking part. Please let me know if I should handle
this differently.
Octavian Purdila (3):
sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code
sysctl: add proc_dobitmap
net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers
Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt | 12 +
drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c | 7 +-
include/linux/sysctl.h | 2 +
include/net/ip.h | 6 +
kernel/sysctl.c | 374 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 5 +
net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 2 +
net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c | 7 +
net/ipv4/udp.c | 3 +-
net/sctp/socket.c | 2 +
10 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 156 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists