linux-kernel - Re: [PWM PATCH 2/5] Emulates PWM hardware using a high-resolution timer and a GPIO pin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:58:01 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>
Cc:	linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PWM PATCH 2/5] Emulates PWM hardware using a high-resolution
 timer and a GPIO pin

On Thu 2010-02-11 14:35:14, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> +static void
> >> +gpio_pwm_work (struct work_struct *work)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct gpio_pwm *gp = container_of(work, struct gpio_pwm, work);
> >> +
> >> +	if (gp->active)
> >> +		gpio_direction_output(gp->gpio, gp->polarity ? 1 : 0);
> >> +	else
> >> +		gpio_direction_output(gp->gpio, gp->polarity ? 0 : 1);
> >> +}
> >>     
> >
> > ...polarity ^ active ?
> >   
> 
> ... except that if polarity and/or active are >1, I don't send the
> values 1 or 0 to gpio_direction_output.  I don't know if the API is
> specifically intended to accept nonzero values that are greater than 1.

!polarity ^ !active ? :-).
									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/