[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1265924254.15603.79.camel@calx>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:37:34 -0600
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>,
Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] readahead: bump up the default readahead size
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 21:46 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Firstly inform the linux-embedded maintainers :)
>
> I think it's a good suggestion to add a config option
> (CONFIG_READAHEAD_SIZE). Will update the patch..
I don't have a strong opinion here beyond the nagging feeling that we
should be using a per-bdev scaling window scheme rather than something
static.
--
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists