[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100211215508.GB18202@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:55:08 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
haicheng.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [1/4] SLAB: Handle node-not-up case in
fallback_alloc() v2
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:41:53PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > When fallback_alloc() runs the node of the CPU might not be initialized yet.
> > Handle this case by allocating in another node.
> >
> > v2: Try to allocate from all nodes (David Rientjes)
> >
>
> You don't need to specifically address the cpuset restriction in
> fallback_alloc() since kmem_getpages() will return NULL whenever a zone is
> tried from an unallowed node, I just thought it was a faster optimization
> considering you (i) would operate over a nodemask and not the entire
> zonelist, (ii) it would avoid the zone_to_nid() for all zones since you
> already did a zonelist iteration in this function, and (iii) it wouldn't
> needlessly call kmem_getpages() for unallowed nodes.
Thanks for the review again.
I don't really care about performance at all for this, this is just for
a few allocations during the memory hotadd path.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists