linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] SCRIPTS: s/should/must/ for all ERRORs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:01:19 +0100
From:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To:	Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@...il.com>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] SCRIPTS: s/should/must/ for all ERRORs

Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@...il.com> writes:

> Personally, I feel that warnings are suggestions and errors are hard
> limits,

This is technically impossible - humans are much smarter than the simple
checkpatch script and still every one of us was proven wrong, many times.

These hard limits are not that necessary, though - a fair dose of
flexibility and common sense is an advantage.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/