[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B73833D.5070008@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:10:37 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/7 -mm] oom: badness heuristic rewrite
On 02/10/2010 11:32 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> OOM_ADJUST_MIN and OOM_ADJUST_MAX have been exported to userspace since
> 2006 via include/linux/oom.h. This alters their values from -16 to -1000
> and from +15 to +1000, respectively.
That seems like a bad idea. Google may have the luxury of
being able to recompile all its in-house applications, but
this will not be true for many other users of /proc/<pid>/oom_adj
> +/*
> + * Tasks that fork a very large number of children with seperate address spaces
> + * may be the result of a bug, user error, or a malicious application. The oom
> + * killer assesses a penalty equaling
It could also be the result of the system getting many client
connections - think of overloaded mail, web or database servers.
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists